pros and cons of cinahl databasehow i felt when i come off xarelto nizoral
2012;10(3):16980. Mahant S, Jovcevska V, Cohen E. Decision-making around gastrostomy-feeding in children with neurologic disabilities. 0000281543 00000 n
The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. 3. We also used this test set to ensure that there was consistency between the four information specialists carrying out the assessment and data extraction. 416 0 obj
<>stream
2012;41(4):42940. Inj Prev. J Med Libr Assoc. Only 6 [15, 35, 36, 40, 41, 55] (14 %) of the 43 reviews did not use any supplementary search methods to identify potential studies for inclusion. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. 0 0 Less than a minute. Assuming a rigorous search strategy was used and the records sought were accurately indexed, we could expect CINAHL to be a good source of primary studies It is possible to overuse limits and inadvertently exclude materials that may be relevant to your research topic. [68] describes this as Their intention is not to identify all literature on a particular topic. 2012;7(5), e37117. Pflege. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 0000008070 00000 n
Scalability The ability to scale on demand. Correspondence to 0000175863 00000 n
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0069-4, http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/project_2011-2016_002.html, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/AboutPage.asp, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001724.htm, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Write by: Subject terms are one of the best ways to find research on a specific topic. 0000016000 00000 n
0000016278 00000 n
WebCINAHL Use the Citation Matcher under the More drop-down menu at the top of the screen. How do I know if an article is peer-reviewed? The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. If ProQuest tips the balance of BNI's database content any further in the direction of international journal titles, they may become a UK database only in name and risk losing the UK nursing database market to the better established and more expansive CINAHL. Monforte-Royo C, Villavicencio-Chavez C, Tomas-Sabado J, Mahtani-Chugani V, Balaguer A. 3, Percentage of papers available in CINAHL). This comprehensive research database provides full text for over 700 nursing and allied health journals indexed in the CINAHL database, and includes a higher number of records, additional journals, records dating back to 1937 and expanded content. 2015;doi:10.1371/journal/pone.0117015. The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients experience of antidepressants. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, editors. The Public Health Research Consortium is funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme. Web(CINAHL) CINAHL database is the most commonly used research database for nurses, allied healthcare professionals, nurse educators, researchers, and students worldwide. Morgan R, Long T. The effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with developmental coordination disorder: a review of the qualitative literature. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. Article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM): systematic review of qualitative evidence. Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review. hS]Ha~l45n*E
lmZu4[2.BJAxA7..bEu6Cw b@2MlZ6)CT$hFL;c/LSxvZ8dooaT]oWmbWpc{pzj;&pFr?zS:~wWI&rJOy}uRkw7=-*@jAk^8ir[Wu]UY.k+6G}M|eqfcw\[7m8=f7]. While we found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews, we could only fully test this on a limited number of reviews, so we are less confident about this finding. Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. 'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section). HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) is generally thought to be a good source to search when conducting a review of qualitative evidence. Systematic Reviews PubMed 0000008623 00000 n
Accessed 18 Jun 2015. Tong A, Howell M, Wong G, Webster AC, Howard K, Craig JC. 2012 [59] states that backchaining of these papers identified a further six of potential relevance but, again, it is not clear whether any of these six papers was uniquely identified in this way or whether it was subsequently included in the review. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. PubMed Waibel S, Henao D, Aller MB, Vargas I, Vazquez ML. It's is a targeted resource, with specific sources of scholarly material in Nursing and Allied Health. Before All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Bookshelf (DOCX 17 kb). 0000003920 00000 n
Click Search. Disadvantages of using CINAHL. February 27, 2023 alexandra bonefas scott No Comments . By using this website, you agree to our Take a few minutes to evaluate all that CINAHL Complete has to offer and youll see why hundreds of thousands of nurses and allied health professionals rely on this essential resource. 2001. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001724.htm. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. Descriptors (controlled vocabulary used to describe the content of 2011;127(6):147181. 2012;8(1):118. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 0000006888 00000 n
Shilling V, Edwards V, Rogers M, Morris C. The experience of disabled children as inpatients: a structured review and synthesis of qualitative studies reporting the views of children, parents and professionals. Health Info Libr J. This page provides a number of links to access materials through the library. In addition, in examining the subheadings of the CINAHL thesaurus term qualitative studies (action research, ethnographic research, ethnological research, ethnonursing research, grounded theory, naturalistic inquiry, phenomenological research) and checking which of these was available in the MeSH thesaurus, we found that only grounded theory was included in MeSH. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Qual Health Res. Background: Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. Cite this article, An Erratum to this article was published on 20 November 2015. CINAHL and PubMed are two of the most widely used databases in the Health Sciences. 0000275178 00000 n
Gill IJ, Fox JR. A qualitative meta-synthesis on the experience of psychotherapy for deaf and hard-of-hearing people. JBI Database Syst Rev Implementation Rep. 2012;10(16):93576. BMC Health Serv Res. 0000007045 00000 n
volume4, Articlenumber:104 (2015) 0000279238 00000 n
2012;26(23):428. Br J Psychiatry. Washington D.C: Institute of Medicine; 2011. A core database from PubMed. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):388-394. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1150. An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x. Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F. Women's perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis. WebThe purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B et al. Kath Wright. 2012;21(2122):315369. Qual Health Res. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination . Kunzler-Heule P, Panfil E. Hepatitis C! We used DARE as it is an excellent source of systematic reviews; it is a database containing critical abstracts of systematic reviews of the effects of health and social-care interventions including prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and the organisation or delivery of health care. We also found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews. 2011;21(6):85371. 2007;57(1):95100. This guide concentrates on CINAHL because it's probably the best known database for Allied Health. Bradshaw SA, Playford ED, Riazi A. Extending the analysis to include this additional group of studies could be valuable, if it were possible to identify a sufficiently large group. 2004. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-5. 2015 Nov 20;4:169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x. 2011;23(10):153551. Duplications with CINAHL, PubMed **** PubMed [corrected]. Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. Introduction to the Library and Library Research by Margaret Vail and Karina Espinosa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Qual Health Res. Life expectancy in the United States has jumped from 47 years in 1900 to 78 years as reported in 2009, and disability in people over Performance Responsiveness, efficient utilization of resources, etc. UoD subscription is the same supplier as CINAHL so easy to run joint searches and to switch between databases. Many individuals have issues using the SQL Server Integration Services to The small group of reviews investigates topics covering an equally wide range of topic areas as examined by the overall sample as follows: experiences of breastfeeding, old peoples experience of dependency, fathers experience of birth, patient experience of being in isolation, preoperative communication and occupational therapy home visits. Gomersall T, Madill A, Summers LK. Indeed, as reviews are now carried out in a wide range of specialised topic areas such as diagnostics and prognostics, public health, adverse effects and economic evaluations, it would be difficult to make recommendations that would be appropriate in all circumstances. Resultscan be limited by different criteria, such as age groups, publication type, and sex. Click this checkbox to ensure that all your results are in English. The other 37 (86.0 %) reviews all reported some kind of searching activities in addition to using bibliographic databases. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Midwifery. So, assuming a rigorous search strategy and accurate indexing, we could expect CINAHL to be a good source of primary studies for qualitative evidence syntheses. 2012;22(7):897910. The login is your StFX email address (without the @stfx.ca), and the password is your email password. It's available to us in the EBSCOhost platform. Atwal A, Spiliotopoulou G, Plastow N, McIntyre A, McKay EA. WebThanks in large part to NIH-funded medical research, Americans today are living longer and healthier. It provides 0000033980 00000 n
2012;49(12):158297. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! This could suggest that, when seeking to identify qualitative research studies, CINAHL may be a better choice of database than MEDLINE. a systematic review and meta-ethnography from the perspective of patients. PubMed In the case of cinahl 18% were unaware of availability. 0000163738 00000 n
Implement Sci. 2007;45(4):26074. Assuming a rigorous search strategy was used and the records sought were accurately indexed, we could expect CINAHL to be a good source of primary studies for qualitative evidence syntheses. This approach cannot take account of search strategy design, database interface and accuracy of database indexing, all factors that can affect the retrieval of relevant records. Consequently, the findings regarding CINAHLs contribution of unique studies can only be based on 11 (61.0 %) of the 18 reviews (see Additional file 3: Table S3, Number of databases not available for searching). This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the. Abad Corpa E, Gonzalez Gil T, Martinez Hernandez A, Barderas Manchado AM, De la Cuesta-Benjumea C, Monistrol Ruano O, et al. NOTE: EBSCOhostdatabases andEBSCO Discovery Servicegenerate a lot more referrals for DOAJ than any other online platform. This list allows you to select the most relevant term for your search. 0000008783 00000 n
0000281102 00000 n
2005 [8] found EBSCO has the premier and most highly regarded scholarly vocabularies curated by subject matter experts, covering all disciplines and major publishers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 0000271775 00000 n
0000012449 00000 n
Scand J Occup Ther. Limiters reduce the number of results returned and make the remaining results more likely to be relevant to your research topic. WebThere are pros and cons to each search option, but the advanced screen will offer the novice user an easier way to enter multiple terms and combine concepts. 2009;21(10):54956. john kizon wife pros and cons of cinahl database. While wishing to identify all the available relevant studies to minimise potential bias, researchers and information specialists also want to minimise the number of irrelevant records retrieved so the choice of databases is a key decision. CINAHL usually provides bibliographic information about a publication (such as its author (s), title, year published, and other publication information) and may often provide access to the full text of an article where its full content can be found. Technology PubMed is a very handy, quick, and easy to use. Although our retrospective analysis showed that for five reviews, all their included studies were available in the CINAHL database, using this information to prospectively select which databases to use in future reviews has limitations. 2011;85:31522. Reviews that cover the wider determinants of health, such as housing, transport and social care are also included. 0000279579 00000 n
0000009368 00000 n
Eybye MN, Madsen SD, Schultz AN, Nim CG. 2012;25(3):18595. Pflege. Booth et al. 2007 Jan;57(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04083.x. Descriptions of database content are included in several guides to conducting systematic reviews [13], but there is no guidance on the optimum choice of databases. Results: Cookies policy. CINAHL and PubMedare often searched for similar material, so this guide presents concepts essential to both. 0000008863 00000 n
Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) is a bibliographic database that includes the fields of nursing and allied health professions, including cardiopulmonary technology, physical therapy, emergency service, physician assistant, health education, radiological technology, medical/laboratory technology and therapy, medical Nurs Stand. As our study was a retrospective audit of the search methods of a sample of systematic reviews of qualitative studies undertaken by other researchers, we did not have access to the original search results and search strategies. 0000189985 00000 n
0000014958 00000 n
Garip G, Yardley L. A synthesis of qualitative research on overweight and obese people's views and experiences of weight management. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the PLoS One. 2012;29(5):25371. p. 1. Available from. 0000005436 00000 n
There are some advantages in searching CINAHL on its own, which you lose by searching it with other databases. 0000254490 00000 n
English Language: Sometimes, articles might have an abstract in English, but the rest of the article is in a different language. One study by Subirana et al. Consequently, we were unable to evaluate the performance of the original search strategies in terms of sensitivity and precision; our study focuses solely upon the current availability of the included studies in the CINAHL database as a performance measure. Walsh D, Devane D. A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. It was produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and a department of the University of York. CINAHL is a database that indexes journals, books, audiovisuals, pamphlets, software, dissertations, and research instruments in all of the allied health professions. 0000271252 00000 n
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Webthe phrase behavioral expressions of distress refers to quizlet; canal pointe apartments in gulfport mississippi. WebCINAHL indexes the top nursing and allied health literature available including nursing journals and publications from the National League for Nursing and the American Nurses Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. February 27, 2023 alexandra bonefas scott No Comments . BMC Med Res Methodol. The systematic review Peoples experiences of attempting to make changes in multiple risk behaviours, including perceived barriers and facilitators was undertaken by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination as part of the Public Health Research Consortium. Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. Malpass et al. For all 43 reviews (21 %) in our sample, we found that some of the included studies were available in CINAHL. Our analysis found that the percentage of unique studies available from the CINAHL database ranged from 3.3 to 33.0 %. Speed- Azure SQL Databases are quickly set up. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in health care. Using the sample of reviews from DARE, we developed the inclusion criteria as listed in (see Additional file 1: Table S1 Inclusion criteria), and we proposed that each review had to meet each of the inclusion criteria before being data extracted. J Clin Nurs. However, remember to choose limiters sparingly Steen M, Downe S, Bamford N, Edozien L. Not-patient and not-visitor: a metasynthesis fathers' encounters with pregnancy, birth and maternity care. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley Child Care Health Dev. 2010;15 Suppl 2:5461. 0000006057 00000 n
0000279729 00000 n
Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, editors . Malpass A, Carel H, Ridd M, Shaw A, Kessler D, Sharp D, et al. Munn Z, Jordan Z. Medication career or Moral career? #include